tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.comments2023-03-23T15:08:05.008+05:30Inverse SquaredLijehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01089766586196455989noreply@blogger.comBlogger389125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-28979772737379219952018-07-02T07:05:08.721+05:302018-07-02T07:05:08.721+05:30ne bonda ra ne bondane bonda ra ne bondaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-23837506663117462752017-04-12T16:37:42.028+05:302017-04-12T16:37:42.028+05:30I guess you wouldn't understand it because peo...I guess you wouldn't understand it because people like you have extreme difficulty in understanding the relationship between personal experience and reality. <br /><a href="http://definedictionarymeaning.com/topic/37836/dabbing-urban-dictionary" rel="nofollow">dabbing urban dictionary</a><br />Ashokhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13693832689410154070noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-45071977784645174072016-01-27T14:33:43.415+05:302016-01-27T14:33:43.415+05:30Rama's killing of Vaali has several consquence...Rama's killing of Vaali has several consquence, as he ambushed him from behind the tree. As a result, Vaali recieved the boon that he will have the honor of killing Ram's next avatar, Krishna. Check out the interesting story in detail. <br /><a href="https://www.ishtadevata.com/blog/vali-ramayana-responsible-death-krishna-mahabharata.html" rel="nofollow"> Why vali is responsible for the death of Krishna</a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06879316212397270073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-29050452454583661822016-01-27T14:30:03.473+05:302016-01-27T14:30:03.473+05:30This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06879316212397270073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-23994996414371906712015-10-16T12:59:51.571+05:302015-10-16T12:59:51.571+05:30i don't know why the author is so biased.is he...i don't know why the author is so biased.is he a racist??if any other historic language with a prominence of the same as sanskrit has originated in any country other than India,it would be praised similarly.karthik golaganihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16734210128655217539noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-60118830365802684942015-09-11T11:32:48.873+05:302015-09-11T11:32:48.873+05:30Sanskrit is a Scientist's paradise
Sanskrit...Sanskrit is a Scientist's paradise <br /> <br />Sanskrit, the vocabulary of which is derived from root syllables, is ideal for coining new scientific and technological terms. The need to borrow words or special scientific terms does not arise. <br /> <br />From the very beginning, scientific principles have been hidden in the verses found in the Vedas, Upanishads and the great epics of India . Concepts and principles seen in present day mathematics and astronomy, are all hidden in the compositions and treatises of many early scholars of the country. Some of these principles and concepts will be shown in the information section that will accompany the lessons. <br />Guesthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14608265522431158966noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-72189859702883218562015-09-11T11:28:04.190+05:302015-09-11T11:28:04.190+05:30Kindly read http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Sanskrit.h...Kindly read http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Sanskrit.htm.Guesthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14608265522431158966noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-84561094036700694922015-05-23T13:06:50.198+05:302015-05-23T13:06:50.198+05:30Ramcharitya manas is consider as authority on mora...Ramcharitya manas is consider as authority on moral behaviour by some hindus. Ramayan was never considered as book on moral authority.<br /><br />Nations are always greater than individual including your family. <br /><br />Ramayana doesnt say whether what Rama did, was right or wrong. <br /><br />Rama never declared himself a God, Gita did. <br /><br />It was not his Dharma to fight with stupid masses, it was the Duty of Brahmans. <br /><br />Ramarajya doesnt mean abandoning your family as your claim.<br /><br />There is no clarity on what a Ramrajya means? It is a mythological construct of a perfect state.vinsin328https://www.blogger.com/profile/05705706658755734551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-68951844818156131702015-04-22T13:43:38.039+05:302015-04-22T13:43:38.039+05:30Hey bro I think that you should try the language o...Hey bro I think that you should try the language of Jainism because it is known as the Prakartik language (Natural language). I think that Prakartik language is more suitable then sanskrit with computers. It is because sanskrit is not the origin, it is also created after the Prakartik language but they both are somewhat similar. Prakartik language is said by the Thirtankars of Jainism religion.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18039246396309850342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-10902071735159697462015-04-22T13:30:10.300+05:302015-04-22T13:30:10.300+05:30hey bro I think that you should the language of Ja...hey bro I think that you should the language of Jainism because it is non as the prakartik language (Natural language). I think that prakartik language is more suitable then sanskrit with computers. It is because sanskrit is not the origin, it is also created after the Prakartik language. Prakartik language is said by the Thirtankars of Jainism religion.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18039246396309850342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-91888190817503302002015-04-14T19:40:38.174+05:302015-04-14T19:40:38.174+05:30Ridicule, you can! But it may hurt those ridiculed...Ridicule, you can! But it may hurt those ridiculed (not all, like me). It only shows that those ridiculing reach their limit of efficiency to express themselves to the level of THOSE ridiculed. No doubt it is funny for for the ridiculer. But humanity suffers. However if ridicule is got through and the target person/group understands your point my above concern doesn't apply. But those are rare cases.<br /><br />So ridicule those who think that they know better than you and for others, I think, one should get down to their (target group/person/issue) levels and convey the message you want to so that humanity do not suffer!<br /><br />Not sure if you could get me! :) Anyway I made the effort!Rameshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11192108874963194725noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-16600556396321808662015-01-04T16:47:31.593+05:302015-01-04T16:47:31.593+05:30honestly indastro got my moon sign Wrong and said ...honestly indastro got my moon sign Wrong and said i'd have bad sight when my eyes are 20/20. if you think i value it over cafe astrology's birth chart you're dead wrongAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-88764529867989112522014-12-11T09:24:41.672+05:302014-12-11T09:24:41.672+05:30Counting 3 years now. Where is your product?Counting 3 years now. Where is your product?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10817199538986187487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-18216325467876764082014-12-11T09:21:02.847+05:302014-12-11T09:21:02.847+05:30OH my God, my head hurts! Why cannot some Sanskrit...OH my God, my head hurts! Why cannot some Sanskrittan Indian develop a product and stun the world! <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10817199538986187487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-4922276290310864142014-12-11T09:05:09.670+05:302014-12-11T09:05:09.670+05:30Most perfect grammer? Lol! This means the language...Most perfect grammer? Lol! This means the language is dead!<br /><br />In Tamil, the people who wrote the grammar said this: "as time passes old may be gone and new will come in and that is the nature". Sanskrit for programming? This is hilarious! People are making ass of themselves.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10817199538986187487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-39887180172567900232014-12-10T02:49:28.343+05:302014-12-10T02:49:28.343+05:30Oh God, my head hurts. Sanskrit is the best langua...Oh God, my head hurts. Sanskrit is the best language for computers, it has perfect grammar, it is the mother of all languages!!! All BS. Can you just shut up and go to work quietly and come out with a useful product and stun us? You can make money for yourself and bring on name and fame to the country? Until then, can you just shut up and do not make the Indians to look stupid?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10817199538986187487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-11657074376971147802014-11-25T12:44:05.945+05:302014-11-25T12:44:05.945+05:30@Lije, why do you try to interpret spirituality in...@Lije, why do you try to interpret spirituality in scientific terms? Anyone can see it is not science, but neither was it meant to be. People follow spiritual practices to gain moral strength and to deal with their problems in life. Yes, some are too ritualistic and it's better not to talk about them. Many people are able to live perfectly fine without any kind of spiritual practices and that's good for them. On the other hand a lot of people get through their daily grind with the help of these practices. So let them be...<br /><br />You are really spending a lot of your time picking up arguments on mutually exclusive topics. Being so scientific yourself, I am surprised you are calling quantum mechanics quackery! It seems that you deride everything that you do not understand.exploringdukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18158378158065347520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-3008270381200243952014-11-25T12:30:06.204+05:302014-11-25T12:30:06.204+05:30I read some of your blogs and although you tried t...I read some of your blogs and although you tried to explore aspects of hinduism and the vedas, you do seem to have a distinct anti-hindu feeling. Hinduism does not impose its values on anyone nor is it involved in evangelist practices. So dont be put off by some persons who might have bugged you with their beliefs. Yes, there would be misconceptions in the understanding of the ancient hindus but give them a break my friend. They have actually tried to understand various physical and biological processes scientifically and you need to give them credit for getting quite a few things right. Hinduism has got the concept of a singularity from which everything originates and ultimately ends - 'big bang' anyone. Their cosmological timescale is pretty accurate given that they did not have the benefits of modern science. Sure, modern human evolution timescales don't fit into their calculations, but parallel universes do. Of course we can argue that a very abstract idea can lend itself to many inferences. <br /><br />Ayurveda, meditation etc have all had their origins and developments in Hinduism. Ayurveda has got concrete medical science behind it - take a look at the NIH papers and you can see proofs. <br /><br />I appreciate your effort to separate the wheat from the chaff, but do open your mind up a little more.exploringdukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18158378158065347520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-82828895784797247142014-11-06T04:47:49.545+05:302014-11-06T04:47:49.545+05:30**It's like a tight rope walker doing ever imp...**It's like a tight rope walker doing ever impossible feats but always returning back to the rope.**<br /><br />Nice description.<br /><br />I simply love Coltrane's "My Favorite Things" and "A Love Supreme".Captain Mandrakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17598800762083673913noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-82823686194150739302014-07-23T15:06:42.363+05:302014-07-23T15:06:42.363+05:30I believe the author of this article has some sort...I believe the author of this article has some sort of anger towards the modern day Hindu apologists and have vented it out in this article. These Hindu apologists are actually such people who get rich by cheat. Quite true. They themselves don't understand much of the Vedic scriptures. Interestingly, very few people understand science also and even science at present is also in the most primitive form. Only 1% of the total universal phenomena has been discovered by science. A huge lot lies there waiting to be discovered. But scientific applications have been discovered in tons. We find huge application of science but very little of science. So, we see planes, trains, cars, phones, computers all around and we feel that science has progressed much and we are an advanced civilization. This is actually our delusion. No major mainstream scientific breakthrough has been achieved in the past 50 years. A new generation of apple IPAD does not apply a new law of physics previously unknown to humans, nor does an advanced version of American F22 fighter aircraft. The real reason for this is that modern day scientists are all professionals and not amateurs. Professionalism dictates that one must work under an organization and work according to its whims, and also all present day organizations are business organizations that exists because of profit. In the time of 19th century the scientific community had a different environment which conduced scientific breakthroughs. So all these scientific applications in our daily lives may give us an illusion of an advanced civilization. So the fact is that science is still primitive. The Vedic scriptures are also primitive as discovered by the author. Hence how can we claim that our science is much updated than theirs. Why is it so difficult to accept the fact that Vedic scriptures are as much updated as present day science, which itself has not progressed much. The sad thing is that we did not take the Vedas seriously, so we had to reinvent the wheel. <br />However, the effort is not useless. Vedas are actually meant to be told and heard, not written down. So, no mathematical equations are present. Mathematical equations are needed only for inventing various applications of science and also to make understand other fellow human beings who has problem in visualizing science. This power of visualization is possessed by only great people. All scientists who discovered the famous things of science, actually did that by this power of visualization and that too in a sub-conscious state of mind. Later when they were confident of their theories themselves, did they penned it down in the form of equations and numbers, so that other dull humans who could not understand by mere thought can give recognition to their work. Vedas are also like the thoughts written down in words. Equations can be formed from them.<br />It is foolish to brag about science. The golden period of science is over. It was 16th century to 19th century, when most of the theories were discovered. Scientific progress does not need some 27 km long tunnel built at a cost of 9 billion dollars as it being done today. So it is not the Vedic knowledge that is stuck in a black hole of reification and reverence, it is actually modern day science instead, whose disciples consider it the biggest achievement of mankind, who thinks that all of Gods creation has been decoded by science and sometimes this reverence towards their scientific belief even leads them to question God’s existence or to define God in their own terms contrary to the teachings of religion.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13630545949442613078noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-11029982805779978802014-07-23T09:13:09.946+05:302014-07-23T09:13:09.946+05:30Good One....Good One....Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13630545949442613078noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-1693992469084069682014-06-05T03:07:51.717+05:302014-06-05T03:07:51.717+05:30This claim has been circulating for years.
There...This claim has been circulating for years. <br /><br />There are plenty of brilliant computer scientists and programmers from India - many from Brahmin families, some of them are bound to know Sanskrit. If Sanskrit is so good as a programming language as some people claim, I just wonder why aren't any of these guys using it as such to write practical real world computer applications? CFynnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00247756203761213527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-6909788035072347362014-03-24T16:25:33.590+05:302014-03-24T16:25:33.590+05:30As a programmer, I really don't see the point ...As a programmer, I really don't see the point of NLP.<br /><br />If you don't understand the machine, you'll be giving it imprecise, backwards and overall wrong instructions.<br /><br />It's already very clearly visible that the worst programs are written in the languages that are easiest to read for non-programmers.L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/13854830988737781320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-53909259192564420042013-11-26T17:20:23.054+05:302013-11-26T17:20:23.054+05:30From : N.SHANKARAPPA TORANAGALLU
(6) In Sanskrit ...From : N.SHANKARAPPA TORANAGALLU<br /><br />(6) In Sanskrit a word can be used in different genders. When it is used in different genders it carries different meanings. [ Ex. Vasu = Wealth (Masculine) , Light (Feminine ) , Sun (Neutar) ] . Sanskrit grammer does not provide any specific guide lines on which either change of gender or its meaning can be known. <br /> <br />(7) In all Natural Languages of the world some words will be having multiple meanings and such multiple meanings are limited to two or three. In Sanskrit there are many words which have 10-15 meanings. This nature of Sanskrit is claimed as its uniqueness elsewhere. Using words carrying diffrent meanings depending upon the context used was one of the favourite pass time of Sanskrit poets and writers. This burst the myth that Sanskrit is most un-ambiguious language unlike other natural languages. The contray is true for Sanskrit. <br /> <br />(8) In Natural Languages to represent an object/thing/concept there will be one or two words. In Sanskrit there are many such alternative words to represent an object/thing/concept. To represent water there are more than 15 different words. This has been claimed as the capacity of Sanskrit. But these alternative words always does not convey same object/concept but vary with context. Therefore Sanskrit can not be a context free language suitable for computer.<br /><br />(9) Sanskrit words have genders where as verb roots are gender free. Therfore verb endings are common for all genders (as in English) . Hence animate and non animate actions can not be distinguished. Ideal un-ambiguious language shall be able to differentiate these actions. Dravidian languages recognize action through genders ( except common verb endings for Plural masculine and feminine). Ambiguity in gender and verb ending in Sanskrit restrict it as a scientific language.<br /><br />(10) Sanskrit adopts same verb endings for events happening (Present) , events just happened (immediate past ) , events just going to happen (immediate future), actions of desire , question etc., Therfore it is not possible to know the time of an event correctly and un ambiguouslu.<br />Many such anomalies can be listed to demonstrate that Sanskrit is not perfect , scientific language to replace present computer languages <br />The back ground for emergence of Paninian Grammer are seen to understand the precise ness of Sanskrit.<br /><br />Vaidikas ( followers of vedas) believed in the non human origin of vedic hymns, They also believed that if the vedic hymns are not chanted properly the desired sacrificial fruits/effects can not be obtained or even may result in disastrous outcomes. In this back ground relying on the power of vedic hymns they gave extreme imporatance to words and their pronounciation. Before Yaska composed his Nirukta (explanation of vedic words and concepts) , the meaning of vedic hymns was obsure with multiple meanings. In this context Kautsa who lived before Yaska declared that vedic hymns are meaning less (ವೇದ ಮಂತ್ರಾ : ನಿರರ್ಥಕ:) If Sanskrit was so scientific and invariable the meaning of vedic hymns would not have been obscure by the time of Kautsa. It seems that as an answer to Kautsa’s comments Yaska tried to explain the each of vedic word. The Ashtyadhyayi - the treatise on Sanskrit Grammer-of Panini , was such an continued attempt to define Sanskrit language . The approach adopted by Panini was superior and first in its nature to describe a language. One can call this approach/method as scientific. The method itself does not certify that the language which it is trying to describe is also scientific. <br /><br />There are many features in Sanskrit which does not follow the precise definitions of Panini. All Natural Languages pocess such features and therefore can not be used for computers to avoid ambiguity in instructions. This has lead to the development of Artificial computer languages<br /><br />(The above article is the partial translation of my oginal article in Kannada (ಕನ್ನಡ) published at www.bayalu.weebly.com) <br />Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14430304250566082853noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467541529999311681.post-18365729763981235912013-11-26T17:18:35.066+05:302013-11-26T17:18:35.066+05:30From : N.SHANKARAPPA TORANAGALLU
The wide claim t...From : N.SHANKARAPPA TORANAGALLU<br /><br />The wide claim that Sanskrit is a complete and scientific language and it is most suitable for Natural Language Processing of computers is a myth and hoax. <br /><br />Those who argue Sanskrit as most scientific language suitable for computers always refer to Paninian grammer. The main argument hinges on the fact that the Paninian grammer defines verb roots (Dhatu) and specifies the rules to change/modify them to obtain various required forms. If one comes out of Panian influence and scrutinize independenetly , it will be clear that the Sanskrit is not a scientific or ordered language as boasted. Those who glorify Sanskrit repeat the features which are in their favour and hide the adverse facts. <br /> <br />(1) Sanskrit has three genders- Masculine, Feminine & Neutral. Each word (praatipadika) – excluding verb roots (dhatu) – has a gender. There is no rule or guide lines to know the gender of any given word. The gender of any word is known from traditional sources which shall be remembered to use it and not from any systematic method. <br /><br />(2) The sentences are formed when words are affected by case declensions. A rough estimate gives 23 types of gender based case declensions on words ending with vowels. Even these 23 types does not cover all possible case declensions . There are 18 exceptions to these. Therefore there are 23 + 28 = 51 types of case declensions on words ending with vowels. Likewise the words ending with consonanats have 18 types of gender based case declensions, along with 31 exceptions totaling 18+31 = 49 types. In order to use words in Sanskrit one has to remember ( 51+49)x7 = 630 types of case declensions on words. This has made Sanskrit highly unscientific and most difficult language to learn. <br />If any new / foreign word is added to Sanskrit there is no way to decide its gender. Unless the gender of a word is decided it can not be used because Sanskrit is case declension oriented language. The case declension of a word is decided by its gender. This has compounded draw back effect on Sanskrit. <br />Dravidian languages of South India which does not belong to Indo-Aryan (Sanskrit) group have single definite rule to decide the gender of any given word and more scientific than Sanskrit in use of case declensions. Word-Gender-Case Declensions are the key elements which are interdependently used in Sanskrit. But there is no scientific or definite method to define these three key elements. <br /><br />(3) The complexity and confusion of Sanskrit declensions are deep rooted. For example the declensions for masculine-Singular vowel ‘a’ ending case declensions can be considered. The third Instrumental case is used to represent – By/through/Along aspects of a word. The fourth Dative case is used to represent – For/Towards/on Behalf aspects of a word. Fifth case Ablative is used to represent – From/Than- aspects of a word. Using same case declensions to represent different aspects of a word rule out the non-ambuigity of Sanskrit.<br /><br />(4) The case declensions does not change with case in any systematic manner . For example the case declensions for masculine vowel ‘a’ ending can be considered. Declensions for third and fourth case for Dual and Plural , (Raamaabhya , RaamEbhya) and declension for sixth and seventh case for Dual are same.(RamayoH). Therefore Sanskkrit does not have un-ambiguous declensions for each case and thus making it to be an unscientific language.<br /><br />(5) Sanskrit has many diffrenet words which give same meaning. Each of these different words can be in different genders . ( Ex. Shareera-tanu-kaayaH , Dheeman-Dheemat). The different genders of different words giving same meaning adopt different type of case declensions which can not be explained by any systematic way. Either Paninian Grammer or any other Sanskrit grammer accounts for such adversity. <br /><br />(The above article is the partial translation of my original article in Kannada (ಕನ್ನಡ) published at www.bayalu.weebly.com) <br />Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14430304250566082853noreply@blogger.com